Review: Sarah Hoyt’s No Man’s Land develops rich tapestry blending SF/fantasy tropes to imagine “first contact” with vast cultural, political and gender differences


By Michael Grossberg

Sarah Hoyt has always been a wonderful storyteller who frequently crosses genre boundaries with engrossing results.

With No Man’s Land, nominated for this year’s Prometheus Award for Best Novel, Hoyt has outdone herself.

Blending the tropes and appeal of science fiction and fantasy, Hoyt weaves many enticing elements into the three-volume novel. Her two deftly entwined stories encompass space opera, mystery, romance, adventure, suspense, intrigue and politics in a vivid “first contact” saga leavened with humor and humanity.

A THREE-PART SAGA WORTH READING

With its multileveled narrative, rich world-building and individualistic themes, No Man’s Land is a novel that Hoyt was virtually born to write. As explained in a recent Prometheus Blog feature about Hoyt’s maturation as a writer, she conceived the story in her adolescence when she was far too inexperienced to write it. No Man’s Land took decades to develop, write and rewrite before finally being published in three volumes in August, September and October of 2025.

As an interesting historical note, the three-volume novel harkens back to an old literary tradition that’s largely faded. Such multi-volume novels were once commonly published and popular in the 19th century, especially in England and France (including Alexandre Dumas’ popular sequel to his bestselling The Three Musketeers, which included The Man in the Iron Mask.)

Still, faced with the prospect of tackling three separate volumes, some readers understandably might hesitate. Is this novel too long? Will the three volumes take too long to read? Will this work reward my investment of time? Happily, Hoyt’s propulsive writing thrusts us into the alternating centers of a tantalizing tale that grabs our curiosity and introduces characters to care about.

Well before finishing it, I realized that Hoyt needed all three volumes to truly tell this epic yet highly intimate saga.

TWO DIFFERENT WORLDS?

Told in alternating chapters with an initial focus on different worlds, No Man’s Land is framed mostly by the radically different perspectives of two central characters, each from a different society and each facing new experiences and unexpected encounters.

Perhaps most affectingly, this is a cross-cultural story of first contact – sparking an endearing love story – with dramatic and poignant ripple effects.

At first, each world seems to exist in a radically different universe. Roughly speaking, one civilization reflects our modern understanding of science, and fits a science fiction scenario of multiple settled planets linked by space ships. Meanwhile, disconcertingly, the other world appears to be based on magic, while fitting common elements of fantasy, including a society roughly familiar from medieval history and royal politics.

Thus, Hoyt immediately challenges us with a tantalizing mystery. Are these two realities entirely separate? If not, how can both co-exist within one larger reality? And if so, how can they possibly connect?

With believable characters, relationships and conflicts that immerse us quickly in each society, Hoyt’s seductive world-building raises questions both metaphysical and practical, with answers that eventually unfold in stages. If you’re already a Hoyt fan, you can be confident that her seemingly contradictory scenarios will pay off later in multiple ways.

CHARACTERS TO CARE ABOUT

What I love most about No Man’s Land is its evolving central relationships, which spark intense emotions and vivid drama as strangers struggle to understand each other and forge common grounds for mutual respect.

At the twin hearts of No Man’s Land are one character from “Earth” (Publius Cornelius Scipio… or “Skip”) and the other on the remote and initially hidden world of Elly (Eerlen, the Arch Mage).

A viscount and Envoy of the Star Empire, Skip starts out training in the interstellar federation’s space-cadet academy. Despite his relative youth and inexperience, as well as some setbacks stemming from mysterious efforts to undermine him, Skip is sent to be the main envoy/ambassador to Draksahl, a lost human colony in the final stages of applying for federation membership.

Skip expects to routinely confirm the application by doublechecking that world’s culture before its now-expected admission. And then things start to go wrong – very wrong – as Skip discovers that things are not the way they first appeared.

Meanwhile, Eerlen, the Arch Mage or leading magician of his world, is facing conspiracies and dangers within the complex hermaphroditic society on Elly.

Political intrigue, deception, shadowy figures, and hidden motivations enrich the narrative as Hoyt engages in one of the more ambitious and interwoven feats of world-building that I’ve read and enjoyed in many years.

EMERGING LIBERTARIAN THEMES

The libertarian themes in No Man’s Land emerge gradually, and only take center stage in the novel’s third volume. Thus, it’s hard to discuss such themes in any detail without revealing major plot twists – and this is an exhilarating tales whose manifold pleasures definitely rely on a thrilling and surprising plot.

Suffice to say that when two drastically different cultures come into contact, conflicts inevitably arise. And when one culture is much freeer than the other, such conflicts involve fundamental issues of individual rights, tyranny and slavery.

The ideals of the interstellar federation are made clear early on. The Star Empire is “a Commonwealth of worlds: a group of worlds who traded with each other, and all agreed to be ruled according to certain principles, and in certain ways. High Britannia (the federation planet where Skip grew up)… has been founded on principles of individual liberty and equal application of justice, regardless of status. And while it had nobility of birth, the nobility came with more of an obligation than privileges…”

Later, Skip shares some of his life and history with a new-found ally, describing “how he’d been a commoner but a warrior, his life devoted to fighting the evil empires, the evil worlds that wanted to enslave others. Both slavery and cannibalism, but also making people into cyborgs, and a lot of other evil things were forbidden in the Star Empire, Britannia on High.”

Admirably from our libertarian perspective, the Star Empire federation not only prohibits slavery but also upholds classical liberal and libertarian principles (albeit imperfectly). These are roughly congruent with many of the ideals, norms and practices of the freeer societies (also imperfect) that we’re familiar with here in the early 21st century.

Sarah Hoyt, the 2011 Prometheus winner (File photo)

As in many of her other novels, Hoyt explores issues important to libertarians in No Man’s Land. Among them: the benefits of voluntarism and cooperation, the virtues of being productive, tolerance of differing beliefs, a laissez faire respect for different genders/sexualities, an appreciation of the civilizing benefits of private property, and of course the perennial dangers that inevitably arise from the concentration and abuse of power.

One of her most libertarian themes is subtly introduced near the start of the first volume, when Skip’s father tells him: “Always remember, Skip, free men fight better than slaves.”

Ultimately, No Man’s Land explicitly drives home the desire of many characters for freedom and independence, while highlighting the true evils of tyranny and slavery.

IMAGINATIVE AND PLAUSIBLE WORLD-BUILDING

Yet beyond her libertarian values and understanding of politics, Hoyt makes us care because of her focus on the personal.

Like her Prometheus-winning novel Darkship Thieves and its Prometheus-finalist sequels Darkship Renegades, A Few Good Men and Darkship Revenge, No Man’s Land powerfully brings to life several deep relationships and incorporates serious romantic elements – making her novels appeal strongly to both men and women.

Impressively, Hoyt achieves something with her world-building in No Man’s Land that I don’t recall her having done on this scale before. Most notably, that includes conceiving a plausible “alien” biology (specifically, a world settled by genetically engineered hermaphrodites with seemingly magical abilities). How Hoyt works out the implications for love, sex, relationships, the family, marriage, customs, law, culture, the economy and the wider society is fascinating, plausible, thought-provoking and surprisingly powerful in its emotional drama.

Perhaps the most notable and influential early example of exploring the impact of biology, sex and gender on culture and society was Ursula Le Guin’s 1970 Hugo- and Nebula-winning novel The Left Hand of Darkness, which centers on the cross-cultural experiences of a human envoy to a planet of “ambisexuals.”

Hoyt read Le Guin’s classic in her youth while growing up in Portugal, but strongly disagreed with both its world-building and imagined biology. In No Man’s Land, Hoyt offers a persuasive alternative.

Her very human characters and dramatic situations will make you think, laugh and cry.

So much is introduced, developed and resolved in this novel’s three volumes, ultimately entertaining and mind-expanding. Yet the vivid fictional future that Hoyt has conceived in her subtitled “Chronicles of Lost Elly” series leaves room for more stories to come. I can’t wait.

ABOUT THE LFS AND THE PROMETHEUS AWARDS

Join us! To help sustain the Prometheus Awards and support a cultural and literary strategy to appreciate and honor freedom-loving fiction,  join the Libertarian Futurist Society, a non-profit all-volunteer international association of freedom-loving sf/fantasy fans.

Libertarian futurists understand that culture matters. We believe that literature and the arts can be vital in envisioning a freer and better future. In some ways, culture can be even more influential and powerful than politics in the long run, by imagining better visions of the future incorporating peace, prosperity, progress, tolerance, justice, positive social change, and mutual respect for each other’s rights, human dignity, individuality and peaceful choices.

* Prometheus winners: For a full list of Prometheus winners, finalists and nominees – including in the annual Best Novel and Best Classic Fiction (Hall of Fame) categories and occasional Special Awards – visit the enhanced  Prometheus Awards page on the LFS website. This page includes convenient links to all published essay-reviews in our Appreciation series explaining why each of the 106 works that have won a Prometheus since 1979 fits the awards’ distinctive dual focus on both quality and liberty.

* Watch videos of past Prometheus Awards ceremonies, Libertarian Futurist Society panel discussions with noted sf authors and leading libertarian writers, and other LFS programs on the Prometheus Blog’s Video page.

* Read “The Libertarian History of Science Fiction,” an essay in the international magazine Quillette that favorably highlights the Prometheus Awards, the Libertarian Futurist Society and the significant element of libertarian sf/fantasy in the evolution of the modern genre.

* Check out the Libertarian Futurist Society’s Facebook page for comments, updates and links to the latest Prometheus Blog posts.

Published by

Michael Grossberg

Michael Grossberg, who founded the LFS in 1982 to help sustain the Prometheus Awards, has been an arts critic, speaker and award-winning journalist for five decades. Michael has won Ohio SPJ awards for Best Critic in Ohio and Best Arts Reporting (seven times). He's written for Reason, Libertarian Review and Backstage weekly; helped lead the American Theatre Critics Association for two decades; and has contributed to six books, including critical essays for the annual Best Plays Theatre Yearbook and an afterword for J. Neil Schulman's novel The Rainbow Cadenza. Among books he recommends from a libertarian-futurist perspective: Matt Ridley's The Rational Optimist & How Innovation Works, David Boaz's The Libertarian Mind and Steven Pinker's Enlightenment Now: The Case for Reason, Science, Humanism and Progress.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *