{"id":6612,"date":"2024-05-18T00:12:22","date_gmt":"2024-05-18T05:12:22","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/?p=6612"},"modified":"2024-04-17T12:53:16","modified_gmt":"2024-04-17T17:53:16","slug":"eugene-zamyatin-author-of-the-first-dystopian-classic-novel-of-the-20th-century-is-worth-remembering","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/eugene-zamyatin-author-of-the-first-dystopian-classic-novel-of-the-20th-century-is-worth-remembering\/","title":{"rendered":"Columnist Ed West on Eugene Zamyatin, author of the first classic dystopian novel of the 20th century"},"content":{"rendered":"

By Michael Grossberg<\/a><\/p>\n

When it comes to the birth and development of dystopian literature, Russian dissident writer Eugene (Yevgeny) Zamyatin may have the dubious distinction of being one of the most overlooked novelists of that disturbingly timely and emerging 20th<\/sup>-century genre.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Zamyatin\u2019s We\u00a0<\/em>was the first dystopian novel of the 20th\u00a0<\/sup>century, helping to pave the way for others, most notably George Orwell\u2019s Nineteen Eighty Four\u00a0<\/em>and Ayn Rand\u2019s similarly-themed Anthem.<\/em><\/p>\n

Yet, sadly, references to Zamyatin are rare in today\u2019s culture, media and magazines.<\/p>\n

So it\u2019s nice to see an insightful column that not only mentions Zamyatin but offers revealing commentary about his fiction and places him within the historical and literary context of Russia in the early 1900s.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

British writer Ed West\u2019s column, \u201cWrong Side of History,\u201d is worth checking out in general as a maverick and anti-authoritarian blog that offers observations (and humor) that you\u2019re not likely to find elsewhere.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Yevgeny Zamyatin in a 1923 drawing by artist Boris Kustodiev (Creative Commons license)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

But West\u2019s recent West column is worth mentioning in particular because it incorporates a relatively rare reference to Zamyatin, whose dystopian and anti-authoritarian novel We\u00a0<\/em>was inducted early on \u2013 in 1994 – into the Prometheus Hall of Fame for Best Classic Fiction.<\/p>\n

After having been a prominent old Bolshevik in support of Lenin and Communism, Zamyatin became deeply disturbed by the policies of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union \u2013 especially censorship of literature, the media and the arts and the widespread Soviet suppression of freedom of speech.<\/p>\n

Even libertarian fans of We\u00a0<\/em>will learn a lot from West\u2019s essay about Zamyatin, who was a major literary voice immediately after the Russian Revolution and known for his satirical humor.<\/p>\n

For context, West\u2019s informative and amusing column on \u201cThe one about the utopian ideology which killed millions\u201d begins this way:<\/p>\n

\u201c\u2018Stalin is in his limo, alone with his driver. \u2018Let me ask you a question,\u2019 he says to the chauffeur. \u2018Tell me honestly, have you become more or less happy since the Revolution?\u2019<\/p>\n

\u2018In truth, less happy,\u2019 says the driver.<\/p>\n

\u2018Why is that?\u2019 asks Stalin, his hackles raised.<\/p>\n

\u2018Well, before the Revolution I had two suits. Now I only have one.\u2019<\/p>\n

\u2018You should be pleased,\u2019 says Stalin. \u2018Don\u2019t you know that in Africa they run around completely naked?\u2019<\/p>\n

\u2018Really?\u2019 the chauffeur replies. \u2018So how long ago did they have their revolution?\u2019<\/p>\n

“Bolshevism was an ideology inherently rich in black humour, being a utopian creed which promised heaven on earth and delivered queues, poverty and show trials. It was the gulf between dream and reality which offered such material for jokes \u2013\u00a0anekdoty\u00a0<\/em>or anecdotes \u2013 and whispered comedy became one of the USSR\u2019s few genuine growth areas. This is the subject of\u00a0Ben Lewis\u2019s\u00a0<\/a>Hammer and Tickle<\/a>,<\/em>\u00a0a history of humour under communism, which was published in 2009.<\/p>\n

“There was initially something of a humour boom after the Russian Revolution. \u2018Between 1922 and 1928 seven satirical magazines were published every week in Moscow and St Petersburg with a combined print run of half a million \u2013 the same as the daily edition of\u00a0Pravda<\/em>; this was the first flowering of Communist humour.\u2019<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

\u201cZamyatin, most famous for the proto-Orwellian\u00a0W<\/a>e<\/em>, also wrote\u00a0The Last Tale About Phita<\/em>\u00a0in 1922 in which \u2018a mayor decides that, in order to make the inhabitants of his town happy, he will make everyone equal. He orders them to live together in a large barracks, then shaves every citizen\u2019s hair off to put them on a par with the bald, and makes them mentally disabled to equalise their intelligence\u2019,\u201d West writes.<\/p>\n

Now that\u2019s something I didn\u2019t know: Zamyatin, to his credit, wrote that satirical story decades before Kurt Vonnegut wrote \u201cHarrison Bergeron,\u201d his similarly plotted and themed Prometheus-Hall-of-Fame-winning cautionary tale about the consequences of radical and coercive egalitarianism. (Vonnegut\u2019s story was inducted in 1994 into the Prometheus Hall of Fame. Check out the Prometheus Blog appreciation<\/a> here.)<\/p>\n

West goes on:<\/p>\n

\u201cMikhail Zoshchenko\u2019s\u00a0The Match<\/em>\u00a0features a delegate from the Matchmakers\u2019 Union giving a speech to assembly workers where he tells them that \u2018total output is bounding ahead\u2019 and the quality and quantity of goods improving. The speaker then tries lighting his cigarette and the flaming tip of the badly made match snaps off and hits him in the eye.<\/p>\n

\u201cThis satire boom would not last, and towards the late 1920s Stalin closed down most of the satirical magazines. As a character in Milan Kundera\u2019s\u00a0The Joke<\/em>\u00a0puts it, \u2018No great movement designed to change the world can bear sarcasm or mockery, because they are a rust that corrodes everything it touches\u2019. The regime was following the pattern of revolutionary movements in\u00a0becoming more conservative as they established power<\/a>.<\/p>\n

“Political jokes were banned as \u2018anti-Soviet propaganda\u2019 and the authorities replaced them \u2018with their own brand of dull official humour, which they disseminated in satirical magazines\u2026. There were now two kinds of humour: official and unofficial \u2013 the written and the spoken, the public and the private. In the censored void, a culture of the spoken joke would develop, a collective satirical work produced by the whole population\u2019,” West writes.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>A LIBERTARIAN CRITIQUE OF POWER<\/strong><\/p>\n

More people today \u2013 not only libertarians or LFS members but anyone who cares about art, culture, artistic freedom, freedom of expression and the right to dissent – should remember and honor Zamyatin and his fiction.
\n
\n<\/em>Because of his use of literature to critique Soviet politics, Zamyatin is considered one of the first Soviet dissidents.<\/p>\n

We,\u00a0<\/em>the first work banned by the Soviet censorship board, was smuggled to the West for publication, sparking outrage within the Union of Soviet Writers and leading to Zamyatin\u2019s exile from his homeland.<\/p>\n

Here, for reference, is an excerpt from the Prometheus Blog appreciation of Zamyatin\u2019s classic novel:<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u00a0<\/em>imagines a world of repressive conformity and stagnant stasis within a totalitarian State…. Zamyatin bravely pioneered and imagined what later came to be known as dystopian literature.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\u201cFor better and worse, that dark and cautionary new genre was inspired by the millions of innocent people whose lives were destroyed by the Russian Revolution under Lenin\u2019s communism. The genre took on even more moral weight after the world witnessed the horrors of all the other statist-collectivist variants (from socialism to national socialism and fascism) whose authoritarian excesses and violent extremes of dictatorship, war, famine, poverty and social collapse so brutally marked and disfigured the 20th\u00a0<\/sup>century.<\/p>\n

We,\u00a0<\/em>written in 1920-1921 by the Russian writer and first published in English translation in 1924 in New York, was so critical of collectivist authoritarianism that it wasn\u2019t published in the Soviet Union until 1988, when the era of glasnost led to its first appearance with George Orwell\u2019s\u00a0Nineteen Eighty-Four.\u00a0<\/em>A year later, the two dystopian novels were published together in a combined edition.\u201d<\/p>\n

Read the rest of the appreciation here.<\/a><\/p>\n

IF YOU WANT TO KNOW MORE:<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/strong>* Prometheus winners:\u00a0<\/strong>For the full list of Prometheus winners, finalists and nominees \u2013 for the annual Best Novel and Best Classic Fiction (Hall of Fame) categories and occasional Special Awards \u2013 visit the enhanced\u00a0Prometheus Awards page\u00a0<\/strong><\/a>on the LFS website, which now includes convenient links to the full set of published appreciation-reviews of past winners.<\/p>\n

* Read\u00a0\u201cThe Libertarian History of Science Fiction,\u201d<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0an essay in the international magazine\u00a0Quillette<\/em>\u00a0that favorably highlights the Prometheus Awards, the Libertarian Futurist Society and the significant elements of libertarian sf\/fantasy in the evolution of the modern genre.<\/p>\n

*\u00a0Watch\u00a0 <\/strong>videos of past Prometheus Awards ceremonies (including the recent 2023 ceremony with inspiring and amusing speeches by Prometheus-winning authors Dave Freer and Sarah Hoyt),Libertarian Futurist Society panel discussions with noted sf authors and leading libertarian writers, and other LFS programs on the Prometheus Blog\u2019s\u00a0Video page.<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

*\u00a0Join us<\/strong>! To help sustain the Prometheus Awards,\u00a0join\u00a0<\/strong><\/a>the Libertarian Futurist Society (LFS), a non-profit all-volunteer association of freedom-loving sf\/fantasy fans.<\/p>\n

Libertarian futurists believe that culture matters! We understand that the arts and literature can be vital, and in some ways even more powerful than politics in the long run, by sparking innovation, better ideas, positive social change, and mutual respect for each other\u2019s rights, individuality and human dignity.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

By Michael Grossberg When it comes to the birth and development of dystopian literature, Russian dissident writer Eugene (Yevgeny) Zamyatin may have the dubious distinction of being one of the most overlooked novelists of that disturbingly timely and emerging 20th-century genre. Zamyatin\u2019s We\u00a0was the first dystopian novel of the 20th\u00a0century, helping to pave the way … Continue reading Columnist Ed West on Eugene Zamyatin, author of the first classic dystopian novel of the 20th century<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[32,1585],"tags":[267,167,2152,812,2153,113,2149,2155,2147,2154,654,2151,2148,817,813,2150],"class_list":["post-6612","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-author-updates","category-fiction-in-the-news","tag-anthem","tag-ayn-rand","tag-ben-lewis","tag-eugene-zamyatin","tag-hammer-and-tickle","tag-harrison-bergeron","tag-milan-kundera","tag-orwellian","tag-russian-dissident","tag-russian-revolution","tag-satire","tag-the-last-tale-about-phita","tag-the-wrong-side-of-history","tag-vonnegut","tag-we","tag-zoshchenko"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pe8nGl-1IE","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6612","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6612"}],"version-history":[{"count":12,"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6612\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7001,"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6612\/revisions\/7001"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6612"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6612"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6612"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}