{"id":5735,"date":"2023-04-29T15:49:20","date_gmt":"2023-04-29T20:49:20","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/?p=5735"},"modified":"2024-06-10T23:41:17","modified_gmt":"2024-06-11T04:41:17","slug":"lord-of-the-rings-economist-uses-prometheus-hall-of-fame-classic-to-expose-false-complaints-about-capitalism-and-about-tolkiens-underappreciated-eagles","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/lord-of-the-rings-economist-uses-prometheus-hall-of-fame-classic-to-expose-false-complaints-about-capitalism-and-about-tolkiens-underappreciated-eagles\/","title":{"rendered":"Lord of the Rings: Economist uses Prometheus Hall of Fame classic to expose false complaints about capitalism \u2013 and about Tolkien\u2019s underappreciated Eagles"},"content":{"rendered":"

Why didn\u2019t the Eagles fly the ring to Mount Doom in The Lord of the Rings?<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Even if you haven\u2019t heard fans argue over the alleged \u201ceagle plot hole\u201d in J.R.R. Tolkien\u2019s classic Prometheus-winning trilogy, you should find economist Bryan Caplan\u2019s recent blog post illuminating – as well as Ilya Somin’s Reason<\/em> posting about it.<\/p>\n

An economics professor at George Mason University and a New York Times bestselling author, Caplan finds many parallels \u2013 and similar flaws – between such fan criticisms of Tolkien\u2019s classic fantasy trilogy and socialist criticisms of free markets.<\/p>\n

Thanks to Reason magazine, which published constitutional lawyer Ilya Somin\u2019s column<\/a> highlighting Caplan\u2019s intriguing arguments<\/a> (and some of his own) on Reason’s Volokh Conspiracy legal blog.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Both Somin and Caplan are clearly devout Tolkien fans, well-versed in the intricacies and plausible world-building in his Middle Earth. So they both see through the false argument that the Eagles easily could have destroyed the Ring of Power (and much more simply and quickly) by flying it to Mount Doom to drop into the sea of lava.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

That fan knowledge, combined with their expertise on economics and law, makes for a fascinating and unusual commentary that sheds further light on the anti-authoritarian and libertarian themes and other manifold virtues of LOTR, the 2009 Prometheus Hall of Fame winne<\/a>r for Best Classic Fiction.<\/p>\n

In an essay that should appeal more to sf\/fantasy fans and libertarians to the degree they are familiar with Lord of the Rings,\u00a0<\/em>Caplan defends both much-maligned markets and the heroic but underappreciated Eagles of Tolkien.<\/p>\n

\u201cLike Tolkien’s eagles, markets aren’t perfect, but they are <\/em>awesome.<\/p>\n

\u201cJust as the peoples of Middle Earth are vastly better off with Eagles than without them, so real-world people are vastly better off with markets than would likely be the case with any other economic systems. Indeed, real-world\u00a0<\/a>socialism looks a lot like Mordor under the rule of Sauron. Ditto for real-world fascism and statist nationalism<\/a>.\u201d<\/p>\n

FRESH TAKES ON TOLKIEN
\n<\/strong>LFS leader William H. Stoddard offered fresh insights about LOTR in his now-classic must-read 2018 Prometheus Blog post \u201cWhat Do You Mean \u2018Libertarian\u2019?<\/a> (and why Tolkien\u2019s trilogy deserved its Prometheus.)\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Stoddard and Michael Grossberg later wove additional insights \u2013 about the corruptions of power and the peaceful cooperative libertarian aspects of the hobbit\u2019s Shire \u2013 into their co-written Prometheus Appreciation<\/a> of The Lord of the Rings.
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

But now Caplan and Somin \u2013 both intelligent and articulate in their libertarian understanding of society and markets \u2013 have added new dimensions of understanding and appreciation to Tolkien\u2019s masterpiece.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s an excerpt to give you a sense of the attention to specifics from Somin\u2019s and Caplan\u2019s blog, which deserves to be read in their entirety:<\/p>\n

\u201cCaplan lists some other things fans believe the Eagles should have done,\u201d Somin writes.<\/p>\n

Among them, Caplan asks these questions:<\/p>\n

“Why didn’t the eagles transport Gandalf everywhere instead of making him ride a horse?”<\/p>\n

“Why didn’t the eagles fight at Minas Tirith?”<\/p>\n

“Why didn’t the eagles fly Bilbo and the Dwarves straight to the Lonely Mountain?”<\/p>\n

\u201c…Caplan suggests less criticism of the Eagles for what they could\u00a0<\/em>have done but didn’t, and more gratitude for all the good they did\u00a0<\/em>do,\u201d Somin writes.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Caplan argues, in turn:<\/p>\n

\u201cGive the eagles a break! \u00a0<\/em>The eagles are already doing a ton of great stuff for Middle Earth! They’re giant eagles. Top of the food chain. They could easily just roost safely in their eyries and live out their lives in peace. Yet without asking for the slightest compensation, these heroic birds\u2026
\n\u2026saved Gandalf at Isengard,
\n\u2026fought the Nazgul at the Black Gate,
\n\u2026rescued the Dwarves from the trees when they were surrounded by Goblins and Wargs,
\n\u2026 and delivered the coup de grace at the Battle of the Five Armies.<\/p>\n

The eagles aren’t perfect, but they are <\/em>awesome. Instead of asking the eagles to do even more, how about a little freakin’ gratitude?\u201d<\/p>\n

Caplan then argues that that\u2019s a \u201chandy allegory\u201d for complaints about markets.<\/p>\n

\u201cThey offer\u00a0vastly <\/em>greater benefits than the eagles of Tolkien,\u201d Caplan writes.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
J.R.R. Tolkien in the 1940s (Creative Commons license)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

\u201cTo start, these glorious markets\u2026
\n\u2026fill our stores with cornucopian wealth,
\n\u2026create endless new products,
\n\u2026endlessly improve the products we already have,
\n\u2026offer great convenience,
\n\u2026build massive amounts of spacious, comfortable housing,
\n\u2026pay salaries ten, twenty, a hundred times our physical needs,
\n\u2026offer a vast range of jobs: the whole continuum from low commitment to high commitment, low risk to high risk, low social interaction to high social interaction, low comfort to high comfort,
\n\u2026will pay you something <\/em>to do practically anything<\/em>,
\n\u2026incentivize the world’s most creative and industrious people to share their gifts with the world,
\n\u2026while respecting the principle of voluntary consent. Truly, no one makes you shop at WalMart<\/a>.<\/p>\n

… Yet in politics and popular culture, markets gets even less love than the eagles….<\/p>\n

Like Tolkien\u2019s eagles, markets aren\u2019t perfect, but they are\u00a0<\/em>awesome.\u201d<\/p>\n

Worth noting:<\/em> Caplan\u2019s blog also throws in a fun link to a YouTube video about how \u201cLord of the Rings Should Have Ended\u201d \u2013 with eagles saving the day.<\/p>\n

And as a bonus, his blog links to a YouTube video in which Tolkien himself explained why the Eagles didn\u2019t fly the Fellowship heroes to Mordor.<\/p>\n

For more information, visit Caplan\u2019s Bet On It blog<\/a> on Substack.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Economist Bryan Caplan (Creative Commons license)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Note: Bryan Caplan is an economics professor at George Mason University, specializing in behavioral economics and public-choice theory; an adjunct scholar at the Cato Institute; a self-described \u201ceconomic libertarian\u201d and a New York Times bestselling author.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>Among his books: The Myth of the Rational Voter, The Case Against Education: Why the Education System is a Waste of Time and Money; Open Borders: The Science and Ethics of Immigration <\/em>(co-written with cartoonist Zach Weinersmith); Selfish Reasons to Have More Kids: Why Being a Great Parent is Less Work and More Fun<\/em>; Authority, Obedience and the State;<\/em> and How Evil Are Politicians? Essays on Demagoguery.<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

IF YOU WANT TO KNOW MORE:
\n<\/strong>
\n<\/u><\/strong>* Prometheus winners:\u00a0<\/strong>For the full list of Prometheus winners, finalists and nominees \u2013 for the annual Best Novel and Best Classic Fiction (Hall of Fame) categories and occasional Special Awards \u2013 visit the enhanced\u00a0Prometheus Awards page\u00a0<\/strong><\/a>on the LFS website, which now includes convenient links to the full set of published appreciation-reviews of past winners.<\/p>\n

* Read\u00a0\u201cThe Libertarian History of Science Fiction,\u201d<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0an essay in the international magazine\u00a0Quillette<\/em>\u00a0that favorably highlights the Prometheus Awards, the Libertarian Futurist Society and the significant element of libertarian sf\/fantasy in the evolution of the modern genre.<\/p>\n

*\u00a0Watch\u00a0 <\/strong>videos <\/strong>of past Prometheus Awards ceremonies, Libertarian Futurist Society panel discussions with noted sf authors and leading libertarian writers, and other LFS programs on the Prometheus Blog\u2019s\u00a0Video page.<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>*\u00a0Join us<\/strong>! To help sustain the Prometheus Awards,\u00a0join\u00a0<\/strong><\/a>the Libertarian Futurist Society (LFS), a non-profit all-volunteer association of freedom-loving sf\/fantasy fans.<\/p>\n

Libertarian futurists believe that culture matters! We understand that the arts and literature can be vital, and in some ways even more powerful than politics in the long run, by sparking innovation, better ideas, positive social change, and mutual respect for each other\u2019s rights and differences.<\/p>\n

Through recognizing the literature of liberty and the many different but complementary visions of a free future via the Prometheus Awards, the LFS hopes to help spread better visions of the future that help humanity overcome tyranny, end slavery and war and achieve universal liberty, respect for human rights and a better world (perhaps eventually, worlds) for all.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Why didn\u2019t the Eagles fly the ring to Mount Doom in The Lord of the Rings? Even if you haven\u2019t heard fans argue over the alleged \u201ceagle plot hole\u201d in J.R.R. Tolkien\u2019s classic Prometheus-winning trilogy, you should find economist Bryan Caplan\u2019s recent blog post illuminating – as well as Ilya Somin’s Reason posting about it. … Continue reading Lord of the Rings: Economist uses Prometheus Hall of Fame classic to expose false complaints about capitalism \u2013 and about Tolkien\u2019s underappreciated Eagles<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[2218,2423,1585,1863],"tags":[1928,1930,13,753,285,1929,590,979,1932,504,1933,825,1931],"class_list":["post-5735","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-economics-in-fiction","category-fantasy","category-fiction-in-the-news","category-j-r-r-tolkien","tag-bryan-caplan","tag-eagles","tag-economics","tag-fascism","tag-free-markets","tag-hobbits","tag-ilya-somin","tag-j-r-r-tolkien","tag-mordor","tag-reason","tag-sauron","tag-the-lord-of-the-rings","tag-the-ring-of-power"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pe8nGl-1uv","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5735","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5735"}],"version-history":[{"count":11,"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5735\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5791,"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5735\/revisions\/5791"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5735"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5735"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5735"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}