{"id":2380,"date":"2020-11-11T11:39:01","date_gmt":"2020-11-11T17:39:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lfs.org\/blog\/?p=2380"},"modified":"2025-02-22T15:35:45","modified_gmt":"2025-02-22T21:35:45","slug":"anarchism-socialism-propertarians-and-ambiguous-utopias-ursula-k-le-guins-the-dispossessed-the-1993-prometheus-hall-of-fame-winner-for-best-classic-fiction","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/anarchism-socialism-propertarians-and-ambiguous-utopias-ursula-k-le-guins-the-dispossessed-the-1993-prometheus-hall-of-fame-winner-for-best-classic-fiction\/","title":{"rendered":"“Propertarians,” anarchism, socialism and ambiguous utopias: Ursula K. Le Guin\u2019s The Dispossessed, the 1993 Prometheus Hall of Fame winner for Best Classic Fiction"},"content":{"rendered":"

To highlight the Prometheus Awards\u2019 four-decade history and make clear why each winner deserves recognition as a notable pro-freedom work, the Libertarian Futurist Society began publishing in 2019 an Appreciation series of all past award-winners.
\n
\n\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Here’s an Appreciation of Ursula K. Le Guin’s The Dispossessed,<\/em>\u00a0the 1993 inductee into the Prometheus Hall of Fame for Best Classic Fiction (and perhaps the most controversial work to ever be inducted into the Hall of Fame.)<\/p>\n

By Michael Grossberg<\/a><\/strong>
\nTwo alleged utopias are explored and contrasted in The Dispossessed,<\/em> Ursula K. Le Guin’s 1974 novel about a rebel who leaves one world for the other.<\/p>\n

As befits any intelligent observer of the 20th and 21st century who must take into account the emergence of dystopian fiction as a major subgenre in response to the authoritarian and collectivist horrors of socialism, communism, national socialism and fascism in Russia, China, Germany, Italy and elsewhere, Le Guin underlines her complex theme by subtitling her novel “An Ambiguous Utopia.”<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

Set in the Tau Ceti solar system where two planets rotate around each other, each with a large settled human population but very different governments, cultures, social conditions and biospheres, the complex and multifaceted tale moves back and forth in time and between worlds.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>One is Anarres, an isolated moon with harsh conditions and limited resources settled by a small group of utopian anarchist-syndicalists who call themselves Odonians after their founder; the other is Urras, the larger mother planet beset by war between nations and socio-economic gaps and tensions sparked by extremes of great wealth and poverty.<\/p>\n

The central story focuses on Shevek, a brilliant Anarres physicist intent on challenging the calcified assumptions of both worlds and reuniting them after centuries of mistrust. Often taking immense risks to spark change, the ambitious scientist visits Urras to teach and learn.<\/p>\n

Yet, both worlds have much to learn for both are flawed. For instance, although an anarchist society, Annares is set up without property rights (quite different from \u00a0the rights-based anarchocapitalist models of an ethical and fully free society outlined by libertarian thinkers such as Murray Rothbard).<\/p>\n

Anna’s’ society also faces problems with group-think, mob rule and majoritarian tyranny (a tendency that libertarians view as inherent in democracies unconstrained by meaningful bills of rights and thus potential threats to the rights of individuals and minorities).<\/p>\n

Le Guin\u2019s beautifully written story also explores how the politics and cultures of her \u201cutopias\u201d affects social conventions, concepts, relationships, work, child-rearing, identity and language itself.<\/p>\n

Most notably, the anarchists have attempted to wipe out the very idea of personal property or individualism by eliminating any personal pronouns (a possibility also explored in Ayn Rand\u2019s Prometheus-winning novel Anthem.)<\/em><\/p>\n

This thought-provoking novel – long debated within LFS ranks throughout the first decade of the Prometheus Awards in the 1980s – may have been the most controversial work eventually inducted into the Hall of Fame. That’s partly because of Le Guin\u2019s critique of \u201cpropertarians\u201d (her loose term for anarchocapitalist libertarians) and her mixed verdict about the pros and cons of a utopian socialist alternative that she, as a writer with \u201cdemocratic socialist\u201d leanings, tended to favor.
\n\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

Yet, libertarian futurists are also realists, and appreciate the insights and questions sparked by LeGuin\u2019s penetrating critique of the virtues, flaws, social ills and plausible problems of each of her alternative utopian societies.<\/p>\n

\u201cOther sf novels advocating anarchism often show the society\u2019s problems as stemming from internal subversion. Everything would be just peachy for were it not for the small group of evil people who want to bring back the state. Odonian problems stem from their society itself which makes a far more subtle and profound thought-experiment,\u201d libertarian sf novelist Robert Shea (co-author of\u00a0Illuminatus!)\u00a0<\/i>wrote in his column \u201cAgain, The Dispossessed\u201d (in the Fall 1987 issue of Prometheus).<\/em><\/p>\n

Shea wrote the column to persuade other LFS members that LeGuin\u2019s novel should be recognized with a Prometheus Award.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>\u201cLe Guin does a remarkably good job of portraying a real live anarchist society… Anarres has oppressive institutions, but not because Le Guin fails to understand the nature of freedom,” Shea said.<\/p>\n

“She understands freedom quite well. The Annaresti, in their struggle to survive on an inhospitable planet, came up with solutions that later led to more problems. LeGuin knows that the business of any revolution \u2013 perhaps especially an anarchist revolution \u2013 is never finished.\u201d<\/p>\n

Le Guin thanked the Libertarian Futurist Society for nominating her novel the first time (1983) for the Prometheus Hall of Fame, in a 1983 letter printed in the Prometheus\u00a0<\/em>quarterly early in the decade of LFS discussions that would lead to her award. \u00a0Ultimately, it took another decade of nominations and much internal LFS debate, with the novel being selected as a finalist several years, before The Dispossessed<\/em> finally received enough support from libertarian sf fans to be inducted into the Hall of Fame in 1993.)<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Ursula K. Le Guin (Creative Commons license)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

In that 1983 letter, Le Guin herself acknowledged both differences and similarities in political ideology:<\/p>\n

\u201cEvidently and obviously, I disagree with certain elements of modern American \u201cLibertarian\u201d theory,” she wrote.
\n“Just as evidently and obviously, where this kind of Libertarian stands on Anarchist ground we are standing very close together indeed.\u201d<\/p>\n

Note: Ursula K. Le Guin (1929-2018), called \u201ca major voice in American Letters,\u201d won eight Hugo awards (from 26 nominations) and six Nebula Awards (from 18 nominations) – including the 1974 Nebula Award for Best Novel and the 1975 Hugo and Locus awards for The Dispossessed.<\/i><\/p>\n

Set in the fictional universe of her Hainish Cycle, The Dispossessed\u00a0<\/em>is one of seven novels in Le Guin\u2019s environmentally and socially conscious interstellar future-history series imagining a galactic\u00a0confederation of human colonies founded by the\u00a0planet Hain, an array of worlds whose divergent\u00a0societies \u2013 produced by evolution and genetic engineering \u2013 shed light on what is basic to human nature.
\n<\/i><\/p>\n

Other novels in her Hainish cycle include The Left Hand of Darkness<\/em>, a landmark work exploring gender and sexuality on a fictional planet where humans have no fixed sex; her Hainish trilogy of Rocannon\u2019s World, Planet of Exile, <\/em>and City of Illusions<\/em>; The Eye of the Heron; <\/em>and\u00a0The Telling.
\n<\/em><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a>
Ursula K. Le Guin in 2014 (Creative Commons license)<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

The American author, first published in 1959, had an acclaimed career spanning nearly six decades, with more than 20 novels and more than 100 short stories, plus poetry, literary criticism and children\u2019s books.<\/p>\n

* For a related Prometheus-blog story about the LFS controversy over whether to induct Le Guin’s novel into the Prometheus Hall of Fame, see \u201cReason magazine on our fight over \u2018The Dispossessed\u2019\u201d<\/a>\u00a0<\/u>(posted in January 2018)<\/p>\n

* Coming up soon on the Prometheus Blog:\u00a0<\/strong>An Appreciation of Yevgeny Zamyatin’s We,<\/em>\u00a0the 1994 inductee into the Prometheus Hall of Fame for Best Classic Fiction.<\/p>\n

\"\"<\/a><\/p>\n

* Other Prometheus winners:<\/strong>\u00a0 For a full list of winners \u2013 for the annual Best Novel and Best Classic Fiction (Hall of Fame) categories and occasional Special Awards \u2013 visit the enhanced\u00a0<\/span>Prometheus Awards page<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0\u00a0on the LFS website. (This page contains convenient direct clickable links to each Appreciation for Best Novel and Best Classic Fiction, as they are published on the Prometheus blog.)<\/p>\n

* Read the\u00a0<\/span>introductory essay<\/a>\u00a0<\/strong>about the LFS\u2019 40th<\/sup>\u00a0anniversary retrospective series of Appreciations of past Prometheus Awards winners, with an overview of the awards\u2019 four-decade history that launched the series in 2019 with review-essays about more than 40 Best Novel winners and that continues most weeks in 2020 with appreciations of the more than 40 Best Classic Fiction winners in the Prometheus Hall of Fame. If you\u2019ve ever wondered why some fiction is recognized with a Prometheus, this series will help you better understand what LFS members see as the libertarian and anti-authoritarian themes in each winner.<\/p>\n

* Read\u00a0<\/span>\u201cThe Libertarian History of Science Fiction,\u201d<\/strong><\/a>an essay in the June 2020 issue of the international magazine\u00a0<\/span>Quillette\u00a0<\/i>that favorably highlights the Prometheus Awards, the Libertarian Futurist Society and the significant element of libertarian sf\/fantasy in the modern genre.<\/p>\n

* Join us<\/strong>! To help sustain the Prometheus Awards,\u00a0join\u00a0<\/strong><\/a>the Libertarian Futurist Society\u00a0<\/strong>(LFS), a non-profit all-volunteer association of freedom-loving sf\/fantasy fans, and help nominate, judge and vote for the annual Prometheus Award winners. Libertarian futurists believe upholding and advancing culture is as vital as politics in spreading positive visions of the future, achieving a flourishing society based on cooperation instead of coercion and a better, free-er world (perhaps eventually, worlds) for all.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

To highlight the Prometheus Awards\u2019 four-decade history and make clear why each winner deserves recognition as a notable pro-freedom work, the Libertarian Futurist Society began publishing in 2019 an Appreciation series of all past award-winners. Here’s an Appreciation of Ursula K. Le Guin’s The Dispossessed,\u00a0the 1993 inductee into the Prometheus Hall of Fame for Best … Continue reading “Propertarians,” anarchism, socialism and ambiguous utopias: Ursula K. Le Guin\u2019s The Dispossessed, the 1993 Prometheus Hall of Fame winner for Best Classic Fiction<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":true,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2}},"categories":[43,2353,160,8,2561],"tags":[799,800,279,744,797,704,802,798,804,803,806,795,801,280,796,794,805,827,335],"class_list":["post-2380","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-appreciations","category-book-reviews","category-hall-of-fame","category-review","category-ursula-k-le-guin","tag-anarchism","tag-annares","tag-capitalism","tag-collectivism","tag-democratic-socialism","tag-dystopian-fiction","tag-group-think","tag-libertarian-futurism","tag-majoritarian-tyranny","tag-mob-rule","tag-odonians","tag-propertarians","tag-property-rights","tag-socialism","tag-socialists","tag-the-dispossessed","tag-urras","tag-ursula-le-guin","tag-utopia"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/pe8nGl-Co","jetpack-related-posts":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2380","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2380"}],"version-history":[{"count":22,"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2380\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7516,"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2380\/revisions\/7516"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2380"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2380"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.lfs.org\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2380"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}